Read more" />

Formula E’s most successful racer shares his ideas on racing technology

A black formula e car is followed by a red formula e car
Enlarge / Lucas Di Grassi leads Jake Dennis within the 2022 London ePrix.

Sam Bloxham/Components E

Components E will shut out its season this weekend with its first go to to Seoul, South Korea. It is not simply the top of season eight and the final race for the Gen2 electric race cars but additionally marks the collection’ a centesimal race. The game has come a long way since its first ePrix in Beijing in 2014, with extra highly effective automobiles, greater batteries, and a capability to placed on an thrilling race at Monaco, one thing that Components 1 hasn’t been capable of say for a number of many years.

Lucas di Grassi was the winner of that first ePrix and has raced in each ePrix since. He is nonetheless visiting victory lane, most just lately in final Sunday’s London ePrix, and this weekend could rating his 1,000th profession level within the collection. With a background in Components 1 after which Audi’s mighty R18 e-tron Le Mans program, di Grassi is aware of his manner round a race automotive. So he is often particular person to speak to in regards to the future route of the game.

Subsequent season the game will get an all-new automotive, one which’s way more highly effective—and lighter, too. However it’s not fairly as daring, know-how sensible, as the concept di Grassi lobbied for. Though that automotive has but to even race in anger, the varied minds that contribute to Components E’s R&D roadmap are already thinking about Gen4. Since we had the prospect to talk with the driving force forward of this week’s Seoul ePrix, I needed to know his ideas on the place the game ought to go subsequent. As I hoped, he had loads of them.

Eight years after winning the first ePrix, di Grassi remains competitive.
Enlarge / Eight years after successful the primary ePrix, di Grassi stays aggressive.

Sam Bloxham

You’ve been fairly outspoken previously about the place you suppose the technical route of the game ought to go, notably as highway automotive EVs characteristic tech that has gone past what Components E permits. The place do you suppose Gen4 ought to go?

“That is an ideal query. For me, it’s extremely clear from the start the place the know-how roadmap goes, not solely Components E, however all of the FIA [the organizing body for global motorsport], of every thing—for me they should be way more segmented when it comes to which options are higher for various collection. Like, endurance racing ought to be specializing in car-relevant applied sciences. Components 1 ought to have probably the most excessive power-to-weight ratio drivetrains. Then formulation E—probably the most environment friendly engines ever. So for me, I might phase it way more and be sure that the producers they wish to develop and make investments, do,” he advised me.

“[The FIA] have a championship that may develop, and it may well use a few of that experience to crossover to totally different collection, however they do not overlap. And in the meanwhile, there’s a number of overlaps between endurance racing, Components 1, Components E. It is that the laws should not very clear. And I do not suppose there’s someone giving actually, actually clear instructions that that is the way in which these championships are going to evolve, and that is the know-how that truly creates worth for the producer and for the followers and for the world in the long run. I feel in the meanwhile it isn’t a simple factor to do. And in the meanwhile, I do not consider the job is being accomplished in the fitting manner,” di Grassi mentioned.

Leave a Comment