Read more" />

Ex-Tesla worker who suffered racist abuse rejects $15M award, seeks new trial

Illustration of a stamp that prints the word

Getty Photos | Bet_Noire

A former Tesla employee who gained a racial discrimination case in opposition to the corporate has rejected a $15 million payout and can search a brand new damages trial.

A jury had awarded plaintiff Owen Diaz $137 million in October 2021, however in April, a federal choose reduced the payout to $15 million. In that ruling, US District Choose William Orrick rejected Tesla’s declare that it isn’t accountable for the “disturbing” racist abuse suffered by Diaz, who’s Black, however discovered that the jury overreached in its damages calculation.

Diaz had the choice of accepting or rejecting the decrease payout, and he rejected it in a court filing on Tuesday. The case is in US District Court docket for the Northern District of California.

“In rejecting the courtroom’s extreme discount by asking for a brand new trial, Mr. Diaz is once more asking a jury of his friends to judge what Tesla did to him and to supply simply compensation for the torrent of racist slurs that was directed at him,” Diaz’s lawyer, Larry Organ, mentioned in a statement to Bloomberg. “Mr. Diaz seeks to revive a good and simply punitive damages award that can punish and deter Tesla for the racist conduct to which Mr. Diaz was subjected and to forestall future harassment from occurring.”

Choose: $137M award wasn’t supported by the proof

The jury awarded Diaz $6.9 million in compensatory damages and $130 million in punitive damages, and Orrick decreased that to $1.5 million in compensatory damages and $13.5 million in punitive damages. The choose wrote that $1.5 million in compensatory damages is “the best award supported by the proof” and that the punitive damages could be 9 instances that quantity based mostly on US legislation.

In rejecting Tesla’s declare that Diaz suffered solely “backyard selection” emotional misery that was “happily gentle and short-lived,” Orrick wrote that the proof of racist abuse “was disturbing.”

“The jury heard that the Tesla manufacturing facility was saturated with racism. Diaz confronted frequent racial abuse, together with the n-word and different slurs,” Orrick wrote. “Different staff harassed him. His supervisors and Tesla’s broader administration construction did little or nothing to reply. And supervisors even joined in on the abuse, one going as far as to threaten Diaz and draw a racist caricature close to his workstation.” Diaz operated a freight elevator and labored at Tesla’s Fremont manufacturing facility for 9 months beginning in June 2015.

Orrick held agency in his choice to decrease the award in an order on June 7. Diaz had filed a motion looking for certification of the post-trial order for an interlocutory enchantment, however Orrick wrote that Diaz “has not recognized a controlling query of legislation applicable for speedy appellate assessment.”

“My evaluation of the compensatory damages zeroed in on the actual details elicited at trial,” the choose wrote. “The evaluation of future damages, the truth is, was completely centered on the (lack of) proof at trial.” The jury’s award of $6.9 million in compensatory damages included $4.5 million in previous compensatory damages and $2.4 million in future compensatory damages.

New trial is dangerous for Diaz

Orrick’s order additionally warned that an enchantment would delay the decision of the case with out a lot probability of adjusting the end result:

I’m firmly satisfied that the damages award (compensatory and punitive) was extreme. If I noticed substantial grounds for a distinction of opinion, I might not have issued the remittitur [that reduced damages]. And I’ve little question that certifying this challenge would additional delay decision of a case that’s already 5 years outdated. No issue means that interlocutory enchantment is suitable.

Diaz’s movement looking for certification for an interlocutory enchantment additionally identified that his different choices are dangerous and time-consuming. “[I]n the absence of certification by this Court docket and the Ninth Circuit, the one means Diaz can enchantment the Court docket’s compensatory damages remittitur (apart from by writ of mandamus) is to demand a brand new trial on damages, conduct such a trial, litigate a second spherical of post-trial motions, and then enchantment upon entry of a remaining judgment (after operating the chance of one other remittitur),” Diaz’s movement mentioned.

Tesla is individually dealing with seven lawsuits from women who allege the corporate did not cease rampant sexual harassment at manufacturing facility amenities in Fremont, California, and repair facilities within the Los Angeles space. Within the first of these circumstances, an Alameda County Superior Court docket choose ruled in May that Tesla cannot drive plaintiff Jessica Barraza into arbitration.

In one other lawsuit filed Sunday, laid-off Tesla staff accused the corporate of violating US legislation by failing to supply discover earlier than a mass layoff. The previous staff say they’re entitled to 60 days of pay and advantages beneath the necessities of the Employee Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act.

Leave a Comment